| FAQ |
 |
|
|
 |
| |
| 1. Why should
non-woven fabrics be used in hospitals and, in particular,
in operating theatres ? |
|
In terms of safety, the use of non-woven fabrics in operating
theatres guarantees :
|
|
|
a barrier against germs:
- either by their water-repellent property due to water
repellent "pearling" treatment with absorbent
reinforcements if necessary
- or by their water-proof property due to lamination of
a polyethylene layer.
|
|
|
Low particle emission due to manufacturing
methods
|
|
|
Adapted cutting and folding facilitating
placing
|
|
|
Single-use, which removes the risks of
contamination linked to recycling and reuse.
|
|
|
The product's constant quality (no change
over time as a result of washing or sewing work)
|
|
|
Absorption of excess liquids
|
|
|
Isolation of the operating site by means
of adhesives with good skin tolerance.
|
|
When used, non-woven fabrics are lightweight,
flexible and do not become uncomfortable during a long period
of use. They are very simple to use.
|
| 2. Which fabric
to choose, woven or non-woven ? |
|
During an operation the infection of
the surgical wound is a constant threat. The type of operation
undergone, its duration and the state of the patient's immunity
system are all risk factors, along with air contamination
induced by particles in the operating environment, carrying
germs or micro-organisms that infect the surgical wound.
These particles may be :
|
|
|
dust in the operating environment (via
the ventilation, for instance)
|
|
|
particles from people's skin (desquamation),
carried by the air or transmitted by contact, along with
fibres detaching from textiles. These last two elements
can be controlled by choosing appropriate protective garments
or non-woven surgical drape.
|
|
Numerous studies compare the impact of
non-woven and woven fabrics. The study by W. WHYTE shows,
for example, that the count of particles in suspension in
operating theatre air is reduced by 43% when non-woven fabrics
are used (ref. Journal of Hygiene, 1976, vol 76 : 367-378.).
Two hospitals had the same surgical team use garments and
surgical drapes alternatively in non-woven fabric and in
cotton during 2253 consecutive general surgical operations
(that is to say 1100 for non-woven fabric and 1153 for cotton):
2.27% wound infections were noted with single-use articles
against 6.41% for cotton. (ref. Moylan J.A ; Surgery, gynaecology
& obstetrics, Oct 1980, vol 151 : 465-470).
|
| 3. Does non-woven
fabric help simplify management ? |
|
An increasing number of hospitals use
non-woven fabrics. In addition to the safety they procure
for patients and staff, they are easy to manage since delivered
new and sterile to the hospital :
|
|
|
The responsibility for sterility therefore
falls on the manufacturer and not on the hospital pharmacist,
until reception of the product in the hospital.
|
|
|
Moreover, each product is labelled,
identifiable and traceable by a reference and batch number.
The comparison between the number of pieces delivered, invoiced
and used is easy to check, making possible improved forecasting
and better budget following.
|
|
|
Finally, there is no unexpected increased
cost due to losses or defects for the health establishment
since the products are single use.
|
|
|
Concerning storage, non-woven fabrics
have the advantage of taking up less room than woven fabrics,
which is a non-negligible advantage, particularly in operating
theatres.
|
| 4. How are non-woven fabrics disposed of
? |
|
As laid down in regulations relating to the disposal of
waste from health care activities, where there is risk of
infection, dirty non-woven fabrics must be disposed of in
the same way as all waste where there is a risk of infection.
There are therefore two options:
|
|
|
incineration or pre-treating by disinfecting
instruments making it possible for the waste to be disposed
of with household waste.
|
|
|
For waste that may contain ATNC, the
sole option is incineration.
|
| 5. Is it expensive to dispose of non-woven fabrics ? |
|
On an average, the price of incineration
varies for contaminated waste from 228.67 to 609.80 euros
a tonne, depending on the company and the distance from
the incineration area. When you know that a hospital with
some 50 surgical beds produces some 5 tonnes of waste per
year, that is to say roughly 1 kg per operation, you can
see that this expense, that is so feared by hospital managers
and described as crippling by adversaries of non-woven fabrics,
is, in fact minimal. It works out at between 0.23 and 0.61
euros per operation.
|
|
For the hospitals producing a very high volume of contaminated
waste, the price of disposal can be reduced even more (to
much below 457.35 euros per tonne). It is question of pre-treating
the waste so that it can be disposed of with household waste
and then collected by the municipal services, which works
out even cheaper.
|
| 6. Will non-woven fabrics substantially
increase hospitals' volumes of waste
? |
|
Non-woven fabrics used in the operating theatre represent
0.3% of waste linked to care (720 000 tonnes) and 0.7% of
infected waste generated by hospital activities (311 000
tonnes). The volume thus generated in France represents
some 2200 tonnes per year, that is to say a negligible amount
compared to the total volume of waste produced.
|
| 7. Will the disposal of non-woven fabrics increase pollution
of the environment ? |
|
The evaluation of incineration in respect
to energy is often positive, since the heat released can
be used to produce energy. Finally, as indicated in the
recommendations by EDANA for the production of non-woven
fabrics in the respect of the environment, the non-woven
fabric industry in Europe is actively engaged in a production
that reconciles ecology and cost-saving. It should be recalled
that non-woven fabric is composed of polyethylenes, polyesters,
polypropylenes, celluloses or viscoses and does not emit
toxic gas on combustion. Its destruction releases carbon
dioxide and water vapour, that is to say molecules composed
only of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. No chlorine is released.
Therefore, the generalised use of non-woven fabrics will
not be harmful to the environment.
|
| 8. Do non-woven fabrics have an impact on world deforestation ? |
|
Non-woven fabrics are mainly composed of polymers. These
synthetic fibres, by-products of the petroleum industry,
do not, as such, have an impact on world deforestation.
Only a small part of non-woven fabric contains wood pulps.
And even if all operating theatres had recourse to non-woven
fabrics, the quantity of wood consumed in one year would
barely correspond to three issues of a national weekly newspaper.
|
| 9. What is anti-scratch treatment on protective glasses
? |
|
This is a treatment (varnish) whose main aim is to improve
the resistance to scratches and abrasion of organic lenses.
For non-treated polycarbonate, the index of resistance to
scratches is 300 against 700 for an HVI polycarbonate (diamond
point test).
|
| 10. What advantage is there in anti-UV treatment on protective
glasses worn in the operating theatre ? |
|
It is a treatment designed to eliminated ultraviolet radiations
(between 200 and 380nm) in the solar spectre and artificial
lighting (Wood's lamps, etc.), the latter being particular
harmful to eyes. This is a standard treatment for polycarbonate.
|
| 11. What are the cleaning and decontamination recommendations
for protective glasses
? |
|
Wash in lukewarm water and liquid detergent.
Dry with a dry, soft cloth or special fabric for wiping
glasses.
|
| 12. What risks
are covered by protective glasses in the E.I.F. catalogue
? |
|
|
Resistance to low energy impacts (maximum
speed 45m/s)
|
|
|
Resistance to liquids (single-block type
screen, masks)
|
|
|